NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 2.1x more core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 705 MHz
• Around 90% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 876 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 1142.9x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39418 vs 22732
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.955 vs 66.419
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1294.279 vs 1261.593
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.756 vs 7.89
• 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.78 vs 17.882
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 569.916 vs 309.857
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 8124
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2413
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2226
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 8124
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2413
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2226

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8987 vs 7878
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 vs 576
• 4.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 vs 3598

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7878 8987
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	576 656
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39418 22732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.955 66.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1294.279 1261.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.756 7.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	91.78 17.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	569.916 309.857
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2226
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2226
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3598 17055

Compare specifications (specs)