NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and AMD Radeon R9 M390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 2.1x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 723 MHz
• 1697.6x more texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12776 vs 3597
• Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 810 vs 435
• 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62695 vs 22044
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 187.131 vs 64.199
• Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 vs 1284.053
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.882 vs 5.881
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.673 vs 78.169
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 901.388 vs 312.822
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 6508
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 6508

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390X

• Around 45% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1408
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 125 Watt
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 vs 3717
• 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 vs 3351
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 vs 3717
• 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 vs 3351

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12776 3597
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	810 435
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	62695 22044
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	187.131 64.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2548.187 1284.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.882 5.881
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	117.673 78.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	901.388 312.822
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17812 6508
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 8593
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 24690
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17812 6508
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 8593
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 24690

Compare specifications (specs)