NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1481 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- 443.3x more texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62677 vs 62051
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 vs 2406.499
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.673 vs 25.833
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 15019
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 15019
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 Oct 2019 vs 10 March 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1481 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62677 vs 62051 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 vs 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 vs 25.833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 vs 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 vs 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3716 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- 2.5x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1408
- Around 83% higher maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18555 vs 12778
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 938 vs 810
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.837 vs 187.131
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 vs 15.882
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1002.573 vs 901.388
- Around 65% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9874 vs 5979
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 1408 |
Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18555 vs 12778 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 938 vs 810 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 vs 187.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 vs 15.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 vs 901.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9874 vs 5979 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12778 | 18555 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 | 938 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62677 | 62051 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5979 | 9874 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU116 | GP102 |
Launch date | 29 Oct 2019 | 10 March 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 204 | 201 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 11 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 352 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |