NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• Around 73% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 885 MHz
• Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1185 MHz
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12776 vs 11756
• Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 810 vs 484
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 187.131 vs 168.08
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2548.187 vs 1935.102
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.673 vs 111.023
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 17328
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 17328

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

• Around 64% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1408
• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 125 Watt
• Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78123 vs 62695
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.794 vs 15.882
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1001.496 vs 901.388
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3717
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3351
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3717
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3351
• Around 14% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6838 vs 5978

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12776 11756
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	810 484
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	62695 78123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	187.131 168.08
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2548.187 1935.102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.882 22.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	117.673 111.023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	901.388 1001.496
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17812 17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 8912
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 8055
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17812 17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 8912
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 8055
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	5978 6838

Compare specifications (specs)