NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 62% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 72% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6144 MB vs 2 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 8390
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 8390
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16828 vs 6316
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16828 vs 6316
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 1024 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6144 MB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 vs 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 vs 6316 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 8054
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 8054
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 8054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 8054 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10201 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5572 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 27566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 27566 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70535 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N18E-G0 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 13 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 117 | 165 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
| Transistor count | 6600 million | 2,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6144 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIARTX A5000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600S
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
AppleM2 Ultra 60-core
