NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) and AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1382 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 6.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
• 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 3718
• 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 3718
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16828 vs 12980
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16828 vs 12980
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3356
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3356

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

• Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1590 MHz
• 2.7x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1536
• 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6144 MB
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 vs 487
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13327 vs 10205
• Around 27% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7074 vs 5570

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	487 750
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10205 13327
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	5570 7074
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15109 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15109 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16828 12980
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16828 12980
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8054 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8054 3356

Compare specifications (specs)