NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs AMD FirePro W4300

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and AMD FirePro W4300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 930 MHz
• 2871.9x more texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8627 vs 2818
• 5.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53834 vs 10312
• 6.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 vs 31.528
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1919.95 vs 828.57
• 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 vs 2.985
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.964 vs 59.153
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 492.867 vs 152.484
• 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 3572
• 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 3572

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4300

• Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
• 4x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 365
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6161 vs 3718
• 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17597 vs 3358
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6161 vs 3718
• 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17597 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4300

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8627 2818
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	365 659
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	53834 10312
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	195.93 31.528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1919.95 828.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.6 2.985
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.964 59.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	492.867 152.484
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12301 3572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 6161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 17597
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12301 3572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 6161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 17597

Compare specifications (specs)