NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro 580

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1335 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 664.2x more texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 193.0 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8622 vs 7753
• Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53834 vs 40079
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 vs 109.521
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1919.95 vs 1206.829
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 vs 9.88
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 10113
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 2900
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 10113
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2900

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580

• Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
• 4.5x more memory clock speed: 6780 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 943 vs 364
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.944 vs 94.964
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.984 vs 492.867

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 580

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8622 7753
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	364 943
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	53834 40079
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	195.93 109.521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1919.95 1206.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.6 9.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.964 117.944
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	492.867 511.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12301 10113
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 2900
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12301 10113
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 2900
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3353

Compare specifications (specs)