NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 634.7x more texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 150 Watt
• 187.5x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 8 GB/s
• Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53834 vs 44890
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 vs 150.951
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1919.95 vs 1718.593
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 vs 12.283
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.964 vs 28.289
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3691
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3340
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3691
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)

• Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1140 MHz
• Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1335 MHz
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 1920 vs 1536
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13509 vs 8627
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 852 vs 365
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 710.366 vs 492.867
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 12301
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 12301
• Around 23% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6067 vs 4915

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8627 13509
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	365 852
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	53834 44890
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	195.93 150.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1919.95 1718.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.6 12.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.964 28.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	492.867 710.366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12301 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12301 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	4915 6067

Compare specifications (specs)