NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1335 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- 728.4x more texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 214.3x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53834 vs 37536
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 vs 145.843
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1919.95 vs 1722.98
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 vs 11.661
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.964 vs 37.16
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 10471
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3338
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 10471
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3338
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 2 June 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1140 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1335 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 128.2 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 vs 37536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 vs 145.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 vs 1722.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 vs 11.661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 vs 37.16 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 vs 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 vs 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3338 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- Around 83% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 1536
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13813 vs 8627
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 855 vs 365
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 vs 492.867
- Around 17% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5757 vs 4915
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2816 vs 1536 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13813 vs 8627 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 855 vs 365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 vs 492.867 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5757 vs 4915 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8627 | 13813 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 365 | 855 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 | 37536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | 145.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | 1722.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | 11.661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | 37.16 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | 788.464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3338 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4915 | 5757 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | TU116 | GM200 |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 2 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 333 | 298 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Price now | $679.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1335 MHz | 1075 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 128.2 GTexel/s | 176 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 8,000 million |
CUDA cores | 2816 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,060 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
SLI options | 4x | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin + 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |