NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 62% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 705 MHz
• Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1335 MHz vs 876 MHz
• 379.3x more texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 375 Watt
• 214.3x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53834 vs 22732
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 vs 66.419
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1919.95 vs 1261.593
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 vs 7.89
• 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.964 vs 17.882
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 492.867 vs 309.857
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 8124
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 2413
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2226
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 8124
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2413
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2226

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

• 3.8x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 1536
• 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8987 vs 8622
• Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 vs 364
• 3.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 vs 4912

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8622 8987
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	364 656
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	53834 22732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	195.93 66.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1919.95 1261.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.6 7.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.964 17.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	492.867 309.857
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12301 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2226
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12301 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2226
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	4912 17055

Compare specifications (specs)