NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 175 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 17 October 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 175 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1140 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1335 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16169 vs 8622
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 824 vs 364
- Around 64% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88130 vs 53834
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.062 vs 195.93
- Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3729.447 vs 1919.95
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.133 vs 14.6
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 154.621 vs 94.964
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1303.435 vs 492.867
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 vs 12301
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 vs 12301
- Around 81% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8875 vs 4912
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1140 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1335 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1536 |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16169 vs 8622 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 824 vs 364 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88130 vs 53834 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.062 vs 195.93 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3729.447 vs 1919.95 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.133 vs 14.6 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 154.621 vs 94.964 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1303.435 vs 492.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 vs 12301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 vs 12301 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8875 vs 4912 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8622 | 16169 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 824 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 | 88130 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | 252.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | 3729.447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | 27.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | 154.621 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | 1303.435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4912 | 8875 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU116 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 17 October 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 333 | 140 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Price now | $499.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1335 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 128.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6600 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro W9000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
