NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro P3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 1088 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1335 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8627 vs 6636
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53834 vs 25146
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 9579
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 9579
- Around 41% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4915 vs 3489
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 11 January 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1140 MHz vs 1088 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1335 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8627 vs 6636 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 vs 25146 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 vs 9579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 vs 9579 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4915 vs 3489 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3000
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 365
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro P3000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8627 | 6636 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 365 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 | 25146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | 9579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | 9579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4915 | 3489 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro P3000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU116 | N17E-Q1 |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 11 January 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 333 | 382 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1335 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 1088 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 128.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 168 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |