NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla T4

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA Tesla T4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 1005 MHz
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 vs 127.622
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 1976
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1781
• Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 1976
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1781

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4

• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1335 MHz
• 6.7x more memory clock speed: 10000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10909 vs 8622
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 596 vs 364
• Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 vs 53834
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 vs 1919.95
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 vs 14.6
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 vs 94.964
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 vs 492.867
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 vs 12301
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 vs 12301

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8622 10909
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	364 596
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	53834 61276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	195.93 127.622
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1919.95 3026.812
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.6 18.798
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.964 119.936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	492.867 910.721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12301 14076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 1976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 1781
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12301 14076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 1976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 1781

Compare specifications (specs)