NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 77% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 24x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12930 vs 8137
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 vs 745
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61407 vs 53806
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 vs 141.474
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 vs 13.132
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 vs 112.973
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 vs 799.933
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 10141
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 10141
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 February 2019 vs 26 April 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12930 vs 8137 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 vs 745 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61407 vs 53806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 vs 141.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 vs 13.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 vs 112.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 vs 799.933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 vs 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 vs 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3621.344 vs 2573.643
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3355
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3355
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 vs 2573.643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12930 | 8137 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 | 745 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61407 | 53806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | 141.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | 3621.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | 13.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | 112.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | 799.933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 38251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 38251 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6260 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | TU116 | Capsaicin |
| Launch date | 22 February 2019 | 26 April 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $1,499 |
| Place in performance rating | 200 | 188 |
| Price now | $279.99 | $849 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | 17.05 |
| Design | reference | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6,600 million | 8,900 million |
| Compute units | 128 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 2x 4096 | |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | 277 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 3x 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | DirectX® 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 2x 4096 Bit | |
| Memory type | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon 780M
