NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon VII
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD Radeon VII videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1750 MHz
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 vs 786
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 vs 206.353
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 vs 69.256
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 vs 499.927
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 11724
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 11724
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1750 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 vs 786 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 vs 206.353 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 vs 69.256 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 vs 499.927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 vs 11724 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 vs 11724 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon VII
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16690 vs 12930
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 89406 vs 61407
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4659.199 vs 2573.643
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.606 vs 16.447
- Around 48% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9292 vs 6260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16690 vs 12930 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 89406 vs 61407 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 vs 2573.643 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 vs 16.447 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9292 vs 6260 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon VII
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon VII |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12930 | 16690 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 | 786 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61407 | 89406 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | 206.353 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | 4659.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | 21.606 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | 69.256 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | 499.927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 11724 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 11724 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3360 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6260 | 9292 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon VII | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.1 |
| Code name | TU116 | Vega 20 |
| Launch date | 22 February 2019 | 7 February 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $699 |
| Place in performance rating | 200 | 214 |
| Price now | $279.99 | $699.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | 32.74 |
| Design | AMD Radeon 2nd generation Vega | |
| GCN generation | 5th Gen | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6,600 million | 13,230 million |
| Compute units | 60 | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 3.46 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.7 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.8 TFLOPs | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 115.26 GP/s | |
| Stream Processors | 3840 | |
| Texture fill rate | 432.24 GT/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | 3 |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | 305 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 W | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 1024 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon 780M
