NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 200 Watt
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 vs 748
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 vs 118.544

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1770 MHz
• Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16033 vs 12929
• Around 71% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 61335
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 226.447 vs 208.608
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 vs 2573.643
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.476 vs 16.447
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1106.12 vs 926.614
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 16952
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 16952
• Around 71% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 vs 6261

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12929 16033
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	813 748
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	61335 105171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	208.608 226.447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2573.643 4161.764
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.447 25.476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.886 118.544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	926.614 1106.12
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16952 19811
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16952 19811
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	6261 10685

Compare specifications (specs)