NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1188 MHz
• Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1243 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 130 Watt
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8004 MHz vs 7000 MHz
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11691 vs 7885
• Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57115 vs 38420
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 190.366 vs 115.834
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.492 vs 10.152
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.54 vs 105.263
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 887.857 vs 597.677
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 vs 10320
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3575
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 vs 10320
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3575

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 812 vs 782
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1987.633 vs 1892.505

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11691 7885
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	782 812
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	57115 38420
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	190.366 115.834
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1892.505 1987.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.492 10.152
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	118.54 105.263
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	887.857 597.677
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14998 10320
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3575
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14998 10320
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3575
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3347

Compare specifications (specs)