NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and AMD Radeon R9 M390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 2.1x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 723 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11691 vs 3597
• Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 782 vs 435
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57151 vs 22044
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 190.366 vs 64.199
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1892.505 vs 1284.053
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.492 vs 5.881
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.54 vs 78.169
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 887.857 vs 312.822
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 vs 6508
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 vs 6508

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390X

• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 vs 3717
• 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 vs 3359
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 vs 3717
• 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11691 3597
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	782 435
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	57151 22044
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	190.366 64.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1892.505 1284.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.492 5.881
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	118.54 78.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	887.857 312.822
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14998 6508
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 8593
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 24690
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14998 6508
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 8593
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 24690

Compare specifications (specs)