NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1683 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57413 vs 51438
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 190.366 vs 182.11
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1892.505 vs 1797.792
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.54 vs 26.444
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3638
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3638
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 March 2019 vs 2 November 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1683 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57413 vs 51438 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 vs 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1892.505 vs 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 vs 26.444 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3344 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14692 vs 11693
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 877 vs 782
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.071 vs 13.492
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1035.984 vs 887.857
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 14998
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 14998
- Around 26% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6811 vs 5415
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 8004 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14692 vs 11693 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 877 vs 782 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 vs 13.492 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 vs 887.857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 vs 14998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 vs 14998 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6811 vs 5415 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11693 | 14692 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 | 877 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57413 | 51438 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 | 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1892.505 | 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 | 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 | 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 | 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5415 | 6811 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU116 | GP104 |
Launch date | 14 March 2019 | 2 November 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $219 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 241 | 237 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 6,600 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2432 | |
Texture fill rate | 255.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 8004 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 256.3 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |