NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 960 MHz
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11690 vs 11355
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 782 vs 540
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 March 2019 vs 29 January 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 960 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11690 vs 11355 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 vs 540 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8004 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17150 vs 14998
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17150 vs 14998
- Around 9% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5904 vs 5414
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 8004 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17150 vs 14998 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17150 vs 14998 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3717 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5904 vs 5414 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11690 | 11355 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 | 540 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57151 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1892.505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | 17150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | 17150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5414 | 5904 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU116 | TU106B |
| Launch date | 14 March 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $219 | |
| Place in performance rating | 240 | 204 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6,600 million | 10,800 million |
| Pipelines | 1920 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 8004 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5500 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 56
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X
