NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1227 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1647 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8004 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11691 vs 10579
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 782 vs 525
- Around 64% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57151 vs 34875
- 32.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 103
- 32.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 103
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 March 2019 vs 21 February 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1227 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1647 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 8004 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11691 vs 10579 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 vs 525 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57151 vs 34875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 103 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16345 vs 14998
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16345 vs 14998
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16345 vs 14998 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16345 vs 14998 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11691 | 10579 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 | 525 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57151 | 34875 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1892.505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | 16345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | 16345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 103 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5414 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU116 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 14 March 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $219 | |
| Place in performance rating | 240 | 285 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1647 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1227 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6,600 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,398 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1792 | |
| Texture fill rate | 137.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 8004 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5500 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 56
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X
