NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 736 MHz vs 602 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 288 vs 192
- Around 83% better floating-point performance: 847.9 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 3828 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1914 vs 991
- 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 vs 74
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 February 2012 vs 11 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 736 MHz vs 602 MHz |
Pipelines | 288 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 847.9 gflops vs 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Memory clock speed | 3828 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1914 vs 991 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 vs 74 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 38.5 GTexel / s vs 35.33 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15302 vs 6235
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 38.5 GTexel / s vs 35.33 GTexel / s |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15302 vs 6235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1914 | 991 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 | 74 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6235 | 15302 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.456 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 618.773 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.693 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.232 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.114 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3114 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3114 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GF114 | GT200B |
Launch date | 20 February 2012 | 11 November 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $89.99 | $1,799 |
Place in performance rating | 967 | 1284 |
Price now | $89.99 | $149.99 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 28.95 | 8.67 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 736 MHz | 602 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 847.9 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 288 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 35.33 GTexel / s | 38.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 210 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 91.87 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3828 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |