NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M vs Intel HD Graphics 2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M and Intel HD Graphics 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 64x more pipelines: 384 vs 6
• 93.4x better floating-point performance: 952.3 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
• 9.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1929 vs 213
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 1039
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 1039

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2000

• Around 37% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 620 MHz
• 21.4x more texture fill rate: 850 MTexel / s vs 39.7 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 313

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1929 213
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	313 456
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 1039
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 1039

Compare specifications (specs)