NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 and ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 49% better floating-point performance: 3,333 gflops vs 2x 1,120.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 24% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 286 Watt
- Around 95% higher memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 3600 MHz
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5925 vs 1309
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3323
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3323
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 vs 12 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1046 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,333 gflops vs 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 286 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5925 vs 1309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3323 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
- Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 134 billion / sec
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 2x 800 vs 1536
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 565 vs 560
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 134 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2x 800 vs 1536 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 565 vs 560 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5925 | 1309 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 560 | 565 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18410 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.824 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.06 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3323 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2138 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK104 | R700 |
Launch date | 30 May 2013 | 12 August 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $550 |
Place in performance rating | 523 | 438 |
Price now | $449.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.45 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1046 MHz | 700 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,333 gflops | 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2x 800 |
Texture fill rate | 134 billion / sec | 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 286 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2x 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.3 GB / s | 2x 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA |