NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 91% higher texture fill rate: 210 billion / sec vs 109.8 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1344
- 2x better floating-point performance: 5,345 gflops vs 2,634 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9517 vs 5427
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10021 vs 8276
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 3627
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10021 vs 8276
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 3627
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 November 2013 vs 25 August 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 210 billion / sec vs 109.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 1344 |
Floating-point performance | 5,345 gflops vs 2,634 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9517 vs 5427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10021 vs 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10021 vs 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 3627 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 875 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 980 MHz vs 928 MHz
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 858.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 694 vs 635
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 875 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz vs 928 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 694 vs 635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3342 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9517 | 5427 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 635 | 694 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28211 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.429 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2001.15 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.854 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.067 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 182.11 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10021 | 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10021 | 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3333 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK110B | GK104 |
Launch date | 7 November 2013 | 25 August 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Place in performance rating | 397 | 307 |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.80 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 928 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 875 MHz | 915 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2880 | |
Floating-point performance | 5,345 gflops | 2,634 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2880 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 210 billion / sec | 109.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336 GB / s | 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |