NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 and ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 863 MHz vs 743 MHz
- 13.5x more texture fill rate: 160.5 billion / sec vs 11.89 GTexel / s
- 7.2x more pipelines: 2304 vs 320
- 8.7x better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 475.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1656 MHz
- 12.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8012 vs 660
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 591 vs 397
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 May 2013 vs 14 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 863 MHz vs 743 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 160.5 billion / sec vs 11.89 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops vs 475.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1656 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8012 vs 660 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 591 vs 397 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
- Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8012 | 660 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 591 | 397 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24052 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 57.735 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.407 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.323 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2784 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK110 | R600 |
Launch date | 23 May 2013 | 14 May 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 457 | 377 |
Price now | $740.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 863 MHz | 743 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2304 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops | 475.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 160.5 billion / sec | 11.89 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 241 mm |
Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 106.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1656 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA |