NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 and ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 863 MHz vs 669 MHz
- 3.6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 2x 320
- 4.9x better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 2x 428.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1656 MHz
- 9.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8012 vs 822
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 591 vs 422
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 May 2013 vs 4 April 2008 |
Core clock speed | 863 MHz vs 669 MHz |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 2x 320 |
Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops vs 2x 428.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1656 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8012 vs 822 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 591 vs 422 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 160.5 billion / sec
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 250 Watt
Texture fill rate | 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 160.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8012 | 822 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 591 | 422 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24047 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 57.735 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.407 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.323 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2777 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK110 | RV670 |
Launch date | 23 May 2013 | 4 April 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 454 | 344 |
Price now | $740.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 863 MHz | 669 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2304 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops | 2x 428.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2x 320 |
Texture fill rate | 160.5 billion / sec | 2x 10.7 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 666 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 2x 53.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1656 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA |