NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M vs Intel HD Graphics P4600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M and Intel HD Graphics P4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3450 vs 605
- 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12462 vs 3385
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.836 vs 8.915
- 6.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 960.114 vs 146.479
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.038 vs 1.178
- 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 59.57 vs 10.689
- 12.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 81.753 vs 6.64
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3342
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3342
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 1 June 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3450 vs 605 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12462 vs 3385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 vs 8.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 vs 146.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 vs 1.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 vs 10.689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.753 vs 6.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3345 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 967 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 84 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 963 vs 276
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 967 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 vs 276 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | Intel HD Graphics P4600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3450 | 605 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 276 | 963 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12462 | 3385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 | 8.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 | 146.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 | 1.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 | 10.689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.753 | 6.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3345 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 7.5 |
| Code name | GK104 | Haswell GT2 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 1 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 725 | 685 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 967 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz | 350 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 1344 | |
| Texture fill rate | 108.3 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 84 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | IGP |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1600
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8870M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M385
