NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs Intel HD Graphics 2000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and Intel HD Graphics 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 256x more pipelines: 1536 vs 6
- 299x better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 18x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3843 vs 213
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1039
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1039
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 5 January 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 6 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops vs 10.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3843 vs 213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1039 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1039 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2000
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 993 MHz
- 6.7x more texture fill rate: 850 MTexel / s vs 127.1 GTexel / s
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 324
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 993 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 850 MTexel / s vs 127.1 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 vs 324 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | Intel HD Graphics 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3843 | 213 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 324 | 456 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.42 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 776.776 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.915 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.688 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 1039 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 1039 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 6.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Sandy Bridge GT1 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 5 January 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 779 | 687 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 850 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 10.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 6 |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s | 850 MTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX Go1400
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIATesla C2075
