NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 95% higher texture fill rate: 60.8 GTexel / s vs 31.2 billion / sec
- 3.6x more pipelines: 1024 vs 288
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 1,946 gflops vs 748.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.869 vs 18.62
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.535 vs 635.018
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.351 vs 1.755
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.323 vs 24.476
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 86.304 vs 48.203
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 January 2016 vs 15 November 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s vs 31.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 288 |
Floating-point performance | 1,946 gflops vs 748.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 vs 18.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 vs 635.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 vs 1.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 vs 24.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.304 vs 48.203 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 924 MHz
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 924 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 | 18.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 | 635.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 | 1.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 | 24.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.304 | 48.203 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2011 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6513 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3044 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3491 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3108 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3044 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3491 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3108 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GM206 | GF104 |
Launch date | 1 January 2016 | 15 November 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1174 | 931 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,946 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 288 |
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s | 31.2 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 1,950 million |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 104 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, 2 x Dual-Link DVI-I1 x Mini HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 6-pin |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 108.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |