NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 924 MHz vs 824 MHz
- Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 60.8 GTexel / s vs 39.55 GTexel / s
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 576
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,946 gflops vs 949.2 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.869 vs 13.801
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.535 vs 508.715
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.351 vs 1.535
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.323 vs 27.524
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 86.304 vs 38.664
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 January 2016 vs 22 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz vs 824 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s vs 39.55 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 576 |
Floating-point performance | 1,946 gflops vs 949.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 vs 13.801 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 vs 508.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 vs 1.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 vs 27.524 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.304 vs 38.664 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 | 13.801 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 | 508.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 | 1.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 | 27.524 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.304 | 38.664 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1876 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 429 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5172 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1435 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3531 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3300 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1435 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3531 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3300 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GM206 | GK106 |
Launch date | 1 January 2016 | 22 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1174 | 972 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz | 824 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,946 gflops | 949.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 576 |
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s | 39.55 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 2,540 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 147 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |