NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M and Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2586 vs 1626
• Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9532 vs 5885
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4148 vs 2536
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1586
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2418
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4148 vs 2536
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1586
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2418

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 216

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2586 1626
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	216 572
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9532 5885
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4148 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4148 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2418

Compare specifications (specs)