NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A vs AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A and AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 875 MHz
  • 6.2x more texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s
  • 4x more pipelines: 640 vs 160
  • 5x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 280.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • 8.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2411 vs 277
  • 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 631 vs 202
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 March 2015 vs 21 December 2013
Core clock speed 1029 MHz vs 875 MHz
Texture fill rate 43.4 GTexel / s vs 7 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 160
Floating-point performance 1,389 gflops vs 280.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2411 vs 277
PassMark - G2D Mark 631 vs 202

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM

  • 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 18 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2411
277
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
631
202
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 2411 277
PassMark - G2D Mark 631 202
Geekbench - OpenCL 12495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 49.772
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 757.295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 49.875
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 179.567
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5157
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 5834
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7859
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5157
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 5834
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7859

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A AMD Radeon R5 235X OEM

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell TeraScale 2
Code name GM107 Caicos
Launch date 13 March 2015 21 December 2013
Place in performance rating 475 829
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1085 MHz
Core clock speed 1029 MHz 875 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,389 gflops 280.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 640 160
Texture fill rate 43.4 GTexel / s 7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 18 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 370 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 80.19 GB / s 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3