NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 22.7x more texture fill rate: 109 billion / sec vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 20.8x more pipelines: 1664 vs 80
- 40.8x better floating-point performance: 3,920 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 189.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9646 vs 51
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 773 vs 482
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 September 2014 vs 1 January 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 109 billion / sec vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1664 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops vs 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9646 vs 51 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 773 vs 482 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
- 4.6x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 148 Watt
- 171.4x more memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 148 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
GPU 2: ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9646 | 51 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 773 | 482 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 26971 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.76 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 489.884 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3622 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | GM204 | RV620 |
| Launch date | 19 September 2014 | 1 January 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Place in performance rating | 357 | 322 |
| Price now | $407.76 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1664 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops | 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1664 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 109 billion / sec | 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 148 Watt | 32 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 1x VHDCI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 170 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pins | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970 vs
NVIDIATesla P4
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 16
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970 vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile
