NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 4.6x more core clock speed: 924 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 8x more texture fill rate: 83.04 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 32x more pipelines: 1280 vs 40
- 25.5x better floating-point performance: 2,657 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5733 vs 1191
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18330 vs 5072
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8546 vs 2095
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 3285
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8546 vs 2095
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 October 2014 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 83.04 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,657 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5733 vs 1191 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18330 vs 5072 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 vs 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 vs 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 3285 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 81 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 392
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 81 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 vs 392 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5733 | 1191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 392 | 399 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18330 | 5072 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.157 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.101 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.909 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 | 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 | 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2282 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | GM204 | Haswell GT3e |
Launch date | 7 October 2014 | 27 May 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,560.89 | |
Place in performance rating | 548 | 642 |
Price now | $1,899 | |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.99 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz | 200 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,657 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 83.04 GTexel / s | 10.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 120 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
Quick Sync |