NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon R7 265
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon R7 265 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1216 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 144 billion / sec vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 4,358 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
Launch date | 21 September 2015 vs 13 February 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1216 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 144 billion / sec vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 4,358 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 265
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 100-200 Watt
- 200x more memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 100-200 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 265
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4053 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R7 265 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 21 September 2015 | 13 February 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $395.82 | $149 |
Place in performance rating | 562 | 1697 |
Price now | $605.06 | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.91 | |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1216 MHz | 925 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2048 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,358 gflops | 1,894 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 144 billion / sec | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100-200 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 2,800 million |
Stream Processors | 1024 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Length | 210 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |