NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M vs ATI FirePro V8700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M and ATI FirePro V8700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 750 MHz
- Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 51.84 GTexel / s vs 30 GTexel / s
- Around 92% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 800
- Around 38% better floating-point performance: 1,659 gflops vs 1,200.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 51% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 151 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7361 vs 1539
- 21.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 vs 152.6
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 October 2014 vs 11 September 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s vs 30 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 800 |
Floating-point performance | 1,659 gflops vs 1,200.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 151 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7361 vs 1539 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 vs 152.6 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V8700
- Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 3400 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 527 vs 499
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8543 vs 3342
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 3400 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 vs 499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8543 vs 3342 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V8700
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | ATI FirePro V8700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7361 | 1539 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 499 | 527 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 21477 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 92.634 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1146.534 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.776 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.431 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 308.42 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | 8543 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | 152.6 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2942 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M | ATI FirePro V8700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GM204 | RV770 |
Launch date | 7 October 2014 | 11 September 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 447 | 430 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1127 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 750 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,659 gflops | 1,200.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 800 |
Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s | 30 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 151 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 254 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 108.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 3400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI |