NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs AMD Radeon Sky 500

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK and AMD Radeon Sky 500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• 2.8x more texture fill rate: 213 billion / sec vs 76 GTexel / s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1280
• 2.3x better floating-point performance: 5,645 gflops vs 2,432 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9050 vs 4764
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 551
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.677 vs 54.669
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1293.474 vs 1096.68
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.988 vs 5.352
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 290.861 vs 247.642
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8721 vs 3585
• Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3679 vs 2116
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8721 vs 3585
• Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3679 vs 2116

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Sky 500

• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 889 MHz
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 685.7x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74902 vs 25674
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.633 vs 22.384
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5116 vs 3353
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5116 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Sky 500

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9050 4764
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	597 551
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	25674 74902
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	72.677 54.669
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1293.474 1096.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.988 5.352
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.384 89.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	290.861 247.642
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8721 3585
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3679 2116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 5116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8721 3585
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3679 2116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 5116

Compare specifications (specs)