NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 16.4x more texture fill rate: 213 billion / sec vs 13 billion / sec
- 45x more pipelines: 2880 vs 64
- 44.1x better floating-point performance: 5,645 gflops vs 128 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- 18x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9050 vs 504
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 407
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 3 March 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 213 billion / sec vs 13 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 64 |
Floating-point performance | 5,645 gflops vs 128 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9050 vs 504 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 vs 407 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 889 MHz
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 250 Watt
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 889 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9050 | 504 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 | 407 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25477 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.677 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1293.474 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.384 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 290.861 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3095 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
Code name | GK110B | G94 |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 3 March 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Place in performance rating | 442 | 372 |
Price now | $999.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.82 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 889 MHz | 1000 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2880 | 64 |
Floating-point performance | 5,645 gflops | 128 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 2880 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 213 billion / sec | 13 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 505 million |
Gigaflops | 192 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | S / PDIF |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | DisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVILVDSSingle Link DVIVGA |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336 GB / s | 51 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
PCI-E 2.0 | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
PureVideo HD |