NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X and AMD Radeon R9 290X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 947 MHz
  • Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 192 billion / sec vs 176.0 GTexel / s
  • Around 9% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2816
  • Around 19% better floating-point performance: 6,691 gflops vs 5,632 gflops
  • 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13048 vs 8644
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 770
  • Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.231 vs 114.883
  • Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.245 vs 11.12
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9834 vs 8729
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9834 vs 8729
  • Around 32% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5222 vs 3962
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 17 March 2015 vs 24 October 2013
Boost clock speed 1075 MHz vs 947 MHz
Texture fill rate 192 billion / sec vs 176.0 GTexel / s
Pipelines 3072 vs 2816
Floating-point performance 6,691 gflops vs 5,632 gflops
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 13048 vs 8644
PassMark - G2D Mark 847 vs 770
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 157.231 vs 114.883
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 12.245 vs 11.12
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9834 vs 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9834 vs 8729
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5222 vs 3962

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X

  • 178.6x more memory clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
  • Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42419 vs 40196
  • Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2460.464 vs 1722.566
  • 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.942 vs 38.225
  • Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 628.757 vs 518.554
  • Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7055 vs 3700
  • Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7055 vs 3700
Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed 1250 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 42419 vs 40196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2460.464 vs 1722.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 120.942 vs 38.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 628.757 vs 518.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 7055 vs 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 7055 vs 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3343

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
13048
8644
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
847
770
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
40196
42419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
157.231
114.883
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1722.566
2460.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12.245
11.12
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
38.225
120.942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
518.554
628.757
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9834
8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3700
7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3343
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9834
8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3700
7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3343
3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
5222
3962
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X AMD Radeon R9 290X
PassMark - G3D Mark 13048 8644
PassMark - G2D Mark 847 770
Geekbench - OpenCL 40196 42419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 157.231 114.883
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1722.566 2460.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 12.245 11.12
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 38.225 120.942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 518.554 628.757
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9834 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3700 7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3343 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9834 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3700 7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3343 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5222 3962

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X AMD Radeon R9 290X

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell 2.0 GCN 2.0
Code name GM200 Hawaii
Launch date 17 March 2015 24 October 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $999 $549
Place in performance rating 314 286
Price now $1,999.99
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 7.38
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1075 MHz 947 MHz
Core clock speed 1000 MHz
CUDA cores 3072
Floating-point performance 6,691 gflops 5,632 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 3072 2816
Texture fill rate 192 billion / sec 176.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 8,000 million 6,200 million
Stream Processors 2560

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0 PCIe 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm) 275 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 600 Watt
SLI options 4x
Supplementary power connectors 6-pin + 8-pin 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 336.5 GB / s 320 GB/s
Memory bus width 384 Bit 512 Bit
Memory clock speed 7.0 GB/s 1250 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)