NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs AMD Radeon R9 290X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X and AMD Radeon R9 290X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 947 MHz
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 192 billion / sec vs 176.0 GTexel / s
- Around 9% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2816
- Around 19% better floating-point performance: 6,691 gflops vs 5,632 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13048 vs 8644
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 770
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.231 vs 114.883
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.245 vs 11.12
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9834 vs 8729
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9834 vs 8729
- Around 32% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5222 vs 3962
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 March 2015 vs 24 October 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1075 MHz vs 947 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 192 billion / sec vs 176.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2816 |
Floating-point performance | 6,691 gflops vs 5,632 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13048 vs 8644 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 vs 770 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.231 vs 114.883 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.245 vs 11.12 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9834 vs 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9834 vs 8729 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5222 vs 3962 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X
- 178.6x more memory clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42419 vs 40196
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2460.464 vs 1722.566
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.942 vs 38.225
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 628.757 vs 518.554
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7055 vs 3700
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7055 vs 3700
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42419 vs 40196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2460.464 vs 1722.566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.942 vs 38.225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 628.757 vs 518.554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7055 vs 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7055 vs 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13048 | 8644 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 | 770 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40196 | 42419 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.231 | 114.883 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.566 | 2460.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.245 | 11.12 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.225 | 120.942 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 518.554 | 628.757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9834 | 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 | 7055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9834 | 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 | 7055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5222 | 3962 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X | AMD Radeon R9 290X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GM200 | Hawaii |
Launch date | 17 March 2015 | 24 October 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $549 |
Place in performance rating | 314 | 286 |
Price now | $1,999.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.38 | |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1075 MHz | 947 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,691 gflops | 5,632 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2816 |
Texture fill rate | 192 billion / sec | 176.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,000 million | 6,200 million |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 275 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
SLI options | 4x | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin + 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.5 GB / s | 320 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |