NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN and ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 837 MHz vs 743 MHz
- 15.8x more texture fill rate: 187.5 billion / sec vs 11.89 GTexel / s
- 8.4x more pipelines: 2688 vs 320
- 9.9x better floating-point performance: 4,709 gflops vs 475.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
- 12.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8180 vs 660
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 627 vs 397
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 February 2013 vs 14 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 837 MHz vs 743 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 187.5 billion / sec vs 11.89 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2688 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops vs 475.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8180 vs 660 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 627 vs 397 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
- Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 276x more memory clock speed: 1656 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1656 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8180 | 660 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 627 | 397 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23915 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.027 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1218.137 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.835 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.842 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 215.546 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10176 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10176 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK110 | R600 |
Launch date | 19 February 2013 | 14 May 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 428 | 375 |
Price now | $2,054.59 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.09 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 876 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 743 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2688 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops | 475.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 2688 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 187.5 billion / sec | 11.89 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 106.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384-bit GDDR5 | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 1656 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |