NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN vs Intel HD Graphics P4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN and Intel HD Graphics P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 837 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 15.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8180 vs 516
- 22.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23883 vs 1071
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2225
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2461
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2225
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2461
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 February 2013 vs 14 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 837 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8180 vs 516 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23883 vs 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2461 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4000
- Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 876 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 636 vs 627
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 876 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 636 vs 627 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | Intel HD Graphics P4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8180 | 516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 627 | 636 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23883 | 1071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.027 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1218.137 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.835 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.842 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 215.546 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10176 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10176 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2461 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN | Intel HD Graphics P4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Generation 7.0 |
Code name | GK110 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Launch date | 19 February 2013 | 14 May 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Place in performance rating | 428 | 609 |
Price now | $2,054.59 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.09 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 876 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 650 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2688 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,709 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 2688 | |
Texture fill rate | 187.5 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 1,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384-bit GDDR5 | |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |