NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs Intel HD Graphics 620

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and Intel HD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce MX110

Intel HD Graphics 620

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
3.2x more core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 300 MHz
10.7x more pipelines: 256 vs 24
Around 89% better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1417 vs 922
Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4256 vs 4178
Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2197 vs 1404
Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2197 vs 1404
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3502 vs 1733
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3502 vs 1733

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 November 2017 vs 30 August 2016
Core clock speed	965 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	256 vs 24
Floating-point performance	762.6 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1417 vs 922
Geekbench - OpenCL	4256 vs 4178
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2197 vs 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2197 vs 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3502 vs 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3502 vs 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620

Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 993 MHz
Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 vs 189

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz vs 993 MHz
Texture fill rate	25.2 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 30 Watt
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	216 vs 189

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 620

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1417

922

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

189

216

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4256

4178

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2197

1404

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2197

1404

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3502

1733

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3502

1733

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3340

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3340

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	Intel HD Graphics 620
PassMark - G3D Mark	1417	922
PassMark - G2D Mark	189	216
Geekbench - OpenCL	4256	4178
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2197	1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2197	1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3502	1733
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3502	1733
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3340
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		24.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		227.879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		15.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		30.288
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		343

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	Intel HD Graphics 620
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Generation 9.5
Code name	GM108	Kaby Lake GT2
Launch date	17 November 2017	30 August 2016
Place in performance rating	891	1334
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	993 MHz	1050 MHz
Core clock speed	965 MHz	300 MHz
Floating-point performance	762.6 gflops	403.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	256	24
Texture fill rate	23.83 GTexel / s	25.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count		189 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	32 GB
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5 / DDR3	DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4
Shared memory	0	1
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
Optimus
Verde Drivers
Quick Sync