NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs Intel Iris Graphics 550
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and Intel Iris Graphics 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 5.3x more pipelines: 256 vs 48
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1446 vs 1432
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3502 vs 1290
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3502 vs 1290
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3157
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3157
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 1 September 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 256 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1446 vs 1432 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 vs 1290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 vs 1290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3157 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 550
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 993 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 305 vs 190
- Around 71% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7182 vs 4212
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2675 vs 2197
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2675 vs 2197
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 993 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 305 vs 190 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7182 vs 4212 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2675 vs 2197 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2675 vs 2197 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 550
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | Intel Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1446 | 1432 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 190 | 305 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4212 | 7182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 | 2675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 | 2675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 | 1290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 | 1290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3157 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 9.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | Skylake GT3e |
| Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 1 September 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 904 | 953 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | eDRAM |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX110 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX110 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5300
NVIDIAGeForce MX110 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX110 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150M + nForce 630M
NVIDIAGeForce MX110 vs
AMDFirePro W600
NVIDIAGeForce MX110 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950A
NVIDIAGeForce MX110 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX150
