NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce MX110

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
2.1x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 64 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
1002.4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3502 vs 3478
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3502 vs 3478
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3332
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3332

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 November 2017 vs 27 November 2013
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 64 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3502 vs 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3502 vs 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 3332

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 965 MHz
Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 23.83 GTexel / s
Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
Around 7% better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 vs 1417
Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 189
Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4493 vs 4256
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 2197
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 2197

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1058 MHz vs 965 MHz
Texture fill rate	33.9 billion / sec vs 23.83 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 256
Floating-point performance	812.5 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1749 vs 1417
PassMark - G2D Mark	368 vs 189
Geekbench - OpenCL	4493 vs 4256
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2663 vs 2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2663 vs 2197

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1417

1749

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

189

368

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4256

4493

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2197

2663

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2197

2663

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3502

3478

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3502

3478

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3332

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3332

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark	1417	1749
PassMark - G2D Mark	189	368
Geekbench - OpenCL	4256	4493
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2197	2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2197	2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3502	3478
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3502	3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3332
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		12.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		364.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		18.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		23.499
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		545

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM108	GK106
Launch date	17 November 2017	27 November 2013
Place in performance rating	891	1003
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$109
Price now		$144.81
Value for money (0-100)		16.05
Technical info
Boost clock speed	993 MHz
Core clock speed	965 MHz	1058 MHz
Floating-point performance	762.6 gflops	812.5 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	256	384
Texture fill rate	23.83 GTexel / s	33.9 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	64 Watt
CUDA cores		384
Transistor count		2,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	One 6-pin
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.38" (11.1 cm)
Length		5.70" (14.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB / s	80.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	5.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5 / DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
Optimus
Verde Drivers
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
Adaptive VSync
FXAA
TXAA