NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 28% better floating-point performance: 1,127 gflops vs 883 gflops
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2278 vs 1590
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9412 vs 7012
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 2652
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 1564
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 2652
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 1564
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 May 2017 vs 3 January 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops vs 883 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2278 vs 1590 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9412 vs 7012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 vs 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 vs 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 215
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 vs 215 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2278 | 1590 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 215 | 377 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9412 | 7012 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 994 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 9.5 |
| Code name | GP108 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Launch date | 17 May 2017 | 3 January 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 905 | 851 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 883 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX150 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5300
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
ATIRadeon Xpress 1150 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
AMDFirePro W600
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950A
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX110
