NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 823 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 17x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 170 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4008 MHz
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 vs 31.935
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.365 vs 2.344
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 vs 35.841
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 145.794 vs 64.308
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 4184
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3683
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3333
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 4184
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3683
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3333
• 2.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 994 vs 389

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

• Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 52.7 GTexel / s vs 46.98 GTexel / s
• Around 12% better floating-point performance: 1,263.4 gflops vs 1,127 gflops
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3038 vs 2278
• Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 425 vs 215
• Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11001 vs 9412
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 539.966 vs 495.238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2278 3038
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	215 425
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9412 11001
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	45.905 31.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	495.238 539.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.365 2.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.965 35.841
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.794 64.308
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4330 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	994 389

Compare specifications (specs)