NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs AMD Radeon HD 6790
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and AMD Radeon HD 6790 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 840 MHz
- 1138.7x more texture fill rate: 38.26 GTexel/s vs 33.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 15x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2454 vs 1616
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3808 vs 3127
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3808 vs 3127
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 4 April 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 840 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s vs 33.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2454 vs 1616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 vs 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 vs 3127 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6790
- 2.1x more pipelines: 800 vs 384
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 4200 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 374 vs 230
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3534 vs 2784
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3534 vs 2784
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 800 vs 384 |
Memory clock speed | 4200 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 vs 230 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3534 vs 2784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3534 vs 2784 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6790
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | AMD Radeon HD 6790 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10876 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 | 374 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2454 | 1616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2784 | 3534 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2784 | 3534 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 | 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 | 3127 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.318 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 748.068 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.234 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.768 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.423 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | AMD Radeon HD 6790 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GP108 | Barts |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 4 April 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 765 | 857 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $64.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 39.40 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1594 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1531 MHz | 840 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 38.26 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.13 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,224 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 800 |
Pixel fill rate | 25.50 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s | 33.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 1800 million | 1,700 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,344.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 198 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 134.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) | 4200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |