NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1180 MHz
- 3609.4x more texture fill rate: 38.26 GTexel/s vs 10.6 billion / sec
- 2.7x more pipelines: 384 vs 144
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 230 vs 203
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2454 vs 811
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 3 September 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1180 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s vs 10.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 144 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 vs 203 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2454 vs 811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12379 vs 10876
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3274 vs 2784
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3274 vs 2784
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12379 vs 10876 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 vs 2784 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 vs 2784 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10876 | 12379 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 | 203 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2454 | 811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2784 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2784 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Code name | GP108 | GF106 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 3 September 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 765 | 866 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1594 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 38.26 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.13 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,224 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 144 |
| Pixel fill rate | 25.50 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s | 10.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1800 million | 1,170 million |
| CUDA cores | 144 | |
| Floating-point performance | 339.8 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 60.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) | 1250 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX330 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
ATIRadeon X600 SE
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4550
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce MX330 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
